Receive Public Comment Regarding Ordinance No. 2026-O-25

Expressed general support for the developer but requested single-story twin homes along the west fence line.

Opposed the rezone, arguing for owner-occupied single-family housing and pointing out high vacancy and rental rates in existing multi-family developments.

Shared negative experiences with previous nearby developments and urged limiting the project to single-story homes.

Asked the council to deny the duplex overlay, citing traffic, parking, and a lack of public benefit over existing SF-1 zoning.

Argued that the rezone violates general plan stability area goals and does not meet the legal criteria for changing environs.

Expressed frustration with high-density cookie-cutter condos, lack of tree maintenance, and worsening neighborhood congestion.

Argued that the neighborhood environs have not changed and single-family home development remains viable.

Expressed severe safety concerns regarding traffic volume near schools and an autistic child prone to eloping.

Expressed concern over traffic, declining home values due to rentals, and strained infrastructure.

Questioned why the council would ignore unanimous community opposition and asked technical questions about developer accountability.